LOL. The height of conservative thought right here.
I see nothing wrong with this. Care to elaborate, lemon?
LOL of course you don’t. You’re conservative. Weren’t you the one criticizing this same exact post before? lol now you trying to be edgy?
I preferred the version that featured Eric Holder and Dianne Feinstein, to be honest. Where did i criticize the post?
When did the president say we can’t own guns? And Hitler also supported gun rights
Irony you and Hitler have something in common.
Now everyone is stretching it! Woo!
Ok, Hitler didn’t disarm his citizens, but he did disarm those he wanted to kill. So yes, that is bad. Hitler took away guns (from a small groups) and lots of people died (from those small groups). Hitler also had all guns registered, so he knew who had guns, which made it mighty convenient when it came time to collect from the Jews. Those who didn’t register, were probably the same ones revolting in Warsaw, or they were illegal guns smuggled in to Warsaw, which makes registration pointless. Not only that, but I’ll take it even further, maybe if there wasn’t any registration in the first place the holocaust wouldn’t have even happened.
Now that I have played the completely irrational person reaching for an argument:
When an authoritarian government takes power, it is in the governments favor to take the firearms away from the citizens.This makes it more difficult for revolt and uprisings, and easier to put them down. I’m sure there will be no argument there.
While Obama isn’t seeking to take away all guns, him and most democrats are seeking to make the process more difficult, and outlaw “assault style” rifles, and their magazines. Now, first off, ‘AR’ in AR-15 doesn’t stand for assault rifle, or automatic rifle, it stands for ArmaLite Rifle, the company that developed the style in the 50’s. The government can get away with these variations of the name because most of the public doesn’t know the differences. The reason these are targeted is because they LOOK like military rifles, but they lack a key part of a military gun, the “fun switch” or the fire rate control switch. By definition they are not even similar, assault rifles are designed for battlefield use, and fire automatically, where as their civilian counterparts are semi-automatic. But as Piers Morgan says you don’t need a semi-automatic rife, unless you plan on going to kill everyone (I’m paraphrasing). When in actuality, there are many hunters that use semi-automatic rifles to hunt, and many people who use them successfully in self defense. Not only that, but in the event of a government take over by an oppressive government force (as the second amendment allows), it would be nice to at least even the playing field with weapons, even if it means we have to squeeze the trigger a few more times than a soldier.